Slinking to my goal ...

Created by MyFitnessPal - Nutrition Facts For Foods

Showing posts with label Read all about it. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Read all about it. Show all posts

Sunday, July 12, 2009

So very terrible !!!

We have just found out that this was our friend's mother .. she was in the paper a while ago: Joy Hunter's article .. but this is so terrrible ... especially to walk in to sea and then for these poor children to find her .. FARK .. so horrible!!!

I feel sick to my stomach for my friend .. and angry/sad that someone can take their own life like this .. even though my friend knew she would someday do this (as she was very vocal about euthanasia) .. but to do it this way is just horrible .. but what is the best way to commit suicide .. well no way really right ....

Her daughter would have been none the wiser as she was at the kids disco up at the hall with us in Friday night and so would have been told the next morning after she was identified .. apparently she was very planned with notes etc .. and my friend had taken this week off as a holiday .. and also to support another friend whose daughter is going up to start intensive treatment for her bone cancer ..

Arrghhhh .. so many mixed emotions .. numb .. sad for my friend ..and sad for the loss of Joy  .. so angry at her .. but more angry at the way she did it .. but one small reprieve at least I'm hoping she is now finally at peace ..

Why why why .. RIP Joy ...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Body of woman found on foreshore identified

The body of an elderly woman found washed up on New Plymouth's foreshore has been identified by police.

Joy Mable Hunter, 78, of Eltham, 56km south-east of New Plymouth, was found on Friday by children playing on the rocks.

Her death was not suspicious and had been referred to the coroner, Sergeant Bruce Irvine said.

-NZPA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Body found on foreshore

By LEIGHTON KEITH - Taranaki Daily News

Children playing on rocks found the body of an elderly woman on New Plymouth's foreshore yesterday.

The seven-year-olds made the grisly discovery just before 4pm and told adults who contacted police.

CIB detectives and uniformed police were quickly at the scene.

Bailey Collier, Jacob Allan and Jamie Whalley were playing on the rocks, in front of Kawaroa Park when they saw something in between the rocks.

"Me and my friends weren't really sure what it was," Bailey said.

CIB Detective Gerard Bouterey said the woman appeared to be in her 70s, with long gray hair, she was wearing dark gray tracksuit pants and a purple jacket with a tan lining.

"We don't believe it is suspicious, we just want to identify her," he said.

A post mortem would be carried out once the woman had been identified.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Meet NZ's miracle baby

By DEIDRE MUSSEN - Sunday Star Times

From: Stuff.co.nz

image

Meet Cadence, an Auckland baby who was a frozen embryo for nearly 16 years before being donated by her genetic parents to an infertile couple.

She is believed to be New Zealand's longest ever case of human embryo cryostorage, and the second longest in the world.

The beautiful baby girl smiles as she clasps her genetic brother's teenage-sized finger, staring intently into his eyes.

"She's cute," he murmurs, carefully cradling her.

The pair share more than just genes. They shared a test tube more than 16 years ago.

Unlike him, this miracle newborn has spent 15½ years snap-frozen at -196C as a two-cell embryo, suspended in a vat of liquid nitrogen with 11 other potential siblings at an Auckland fertility clinic.

"It's amazing after more than 15 years in a test tube, she can come out so beautiful. And she has the most gorgeous smile," he gushes.

He, too, started life as a frozen embryo, but was thawed after just a few weeks and was born at Christmas in 1993. Now, the Year 11 student is on the eve of sitting his restricted driver's licence.

His 17-year-old older brother, who is also clearly smitten with the tiny baby, admits the situation is hard to comprehend.

The boys' parents, Aucklanders Peter and Chris, experienced nine years of heartbreaking infertility before adopting their elder son in December 1991. Two years later, their younger son was born following private IVF treatment. As the years passed, Peter and Chris decided their family was complete.

The only problem was they had 12 surplus frozen embryos. The options were discarding or keeping them frozen. They ruled out discarding the embryos because of their long battle to create life, so decided to keep the embryos on ice, hoping a law change would allow their donation.

The law allowing embryo donation came into force in July 2005, under the Human Assisted Reproductive Technology (HART) Act, but Peter and Chris only heard about it in 2007.

After gaining their two sons' approval, they began looking at profiles of infertile couples keen to receive donated embryos. They were about to change another Auckland couple's life forever.

Darryn and Nicola met in August 1992 and married in November 1993. Nine years ago, they started trying to have a baby.

"I was about 30 when we felt ready for a family and thought we shouldn't leave it too late," says Nicola, 39.

They tried for about three years but nothing happened. Tests and a multitude of conception methods followed without success. Doctors told them they had unexplained infertility.

Three cycles of IVF failed and they were warned further attempts were likely doomed so they began investigating other options, including adoption and fostering. They heard about embryo donation in mid-2006 so lodged a profile at Auckland's Fertility Plus, the fertility and reproductive endocrinology unit for National Women's Health, based at Greenlane Clinical Centre.

Several times they were considered by donors, only to be devastated when they were rejected.

At an adoption course in 2007, they were warned their chances were poor, with only 25 of the 100 couples seeking to adopt each year getting a baby. An opportunity to foster a young boy also fell through that year.

They began steeling themselves for the likelihood of life without children.

"We've sat here on the couch many, many nights in tears, just holding each other," says Darryn, 42.

Their luck finally changed in January last year, when Fertility Plus rang to confirm Peter and Chris had selected them for embryo donation. It was the good news they had yearned for but they kept it from family and friends in case of failure.

"It's like winning Lotto," says Darryn. "If you've got $10 million, you're not going to tell the world."

They knew embryo donation was a complex process, plus they were dubious whether such old embryos would survive being thawed.

"When we were told the age of the embryos, we thought `Oh gosh, they're 15 years old' but we don't think that now," Nicola says.

In March last year, the two couples met for the first time at a counselling session, which proved a huge success. They talked for more than four hours, their family values and sense of humour well-matched.

"Once we got talking, the counsellors couldn't get a word in edgeways," says Darryn.

After an anxious six-week wait, the Ethics Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (Ecart) approved their application.

Soon after, Peter and Chris formally signed over legal parental rights for six of their 12 frozen embryos to Nicola and Darryn, deciding to retain six embryos in case the law changes to allow them to donate to another couple. Currently, embryo donation is limited to one family.

The first embryo, frozen solid for all those years in a tiny straw, began slowly thawing one winter's day last July (see embryo freezing process sidebar, right). It was placed into Nicola's womb two days later as a five-cell embryo. This is the photo on the front page of Nicola's baby photo album; an inscription below reads: "The first day of the rest of your life."

When Nicola's pregnancy test was positive two weeks later, she rang Darryn and casually said: "Hi dad."

"I just dropped the phone," Darryn says, beaming.

The excited pair next called Peter and Chris, who were equally stunned but ecstatic.

As the months ticked on, the first-time parents transformed their home into a baby haven, revelling in every step.

Their precious daughter was born by Caesarean section on April 2 at North Shore Hospital to the strains of Bic Runga. She was delivered two weeks before her due date because her growth had slowed. Her birth is captured on video. "Ladies and gentlemen, this is Cadence," Darryn proudly announces moments after her arrival.

Fast forward 10 weeks and the families have come together to talk exclusively with the Sunday Star-Times, eager to promote embryo donation.

The words on Cadence's long-sleeved top quirkily sum up the unusual situation: "Are these people really my relatives?"

"You could call us a mishmash of families but we are two families united with love," Darryn says.

The Ethics Committee encourages openness between embryo donation families, unlike the anonymity preferred in some countries, such as America.

"As soon as Cadence is at an age to understand, she will be told about Peter and Chris," says Darryn.

Nicola was adopted and believes openness around a child's birth family is vital. She sees many similarities between adoption and embryo donation: "It's like adoption with a pregnancy attached."

Nicola and Darryn were initially nervous about the level of contact their donors might want.

"I didn't want anyone landing on our doorstep saying `Thanks for bringing up our child'," Darryn says.

However, their fears have been appeased over time.

Darryn says: "Peter approached me and said, `We will have the interaction you want'. It was like Peter saying, `She's yours bring her up your way'," he says. "They keep reiterating `it's your family'."

Peter, Chris and their youngest son first met Cadence two days after her birth. It was an emotional moment. The video captures Chris's tears as she looks into her genetic daughter's eyes for the first time.

Darryn says some people raised concerns their baby's genetic mother may regret not thawing the embryos to have her own daughter.

"We were watching for any signs she was trying to bond with her. She hasn't," he says. "[Chris] has always said she wouldn't, but she's human too."

Chris says she has no regrets and is happy for Darryn and Nicola.

"When I first picked Cadence up I thought, if I'd had a girl, this is what she would have been like. But then I think, no, I've got two beautiful boys."

Cadence is Darryn and Nicola's daughter, not hers, Chris says.

As a birth gift, Peter and Chris gave the new parents a beautiful leather photo album with Darryn and Nicola's family name embossed in gold letters on its cover.

"I broke down when I saw that," Darryn says, "to just see we are finally a family now."

Undeniably, the couples are on a sensitive, rarely trodden path.

Both families agree open communication is vital. And their mutual respect and warm relationship is evident. As the families talk, they swap parenting tips Peter tells how they put their eldest son on the washing machine as a baby so the vibrations would rock him to sleep. Curiosity over the genetic link naturally surfaces.

"Has she still got blue eyes?" Chris asks.

"Yes," Nicola replies.

They're different to Chris's hazel eyes and Peter's green eyes, as well as their youngest son's.

"Peter's mum has blue eyes," Chris adds.

Nicola can see some physical traits Cadence has inherited from her genetic parents. Ironically, some people, unaware of the embryo donation, point out the baby's likenesses to Darryn and Nicola.

"People who don't know sometimes say `She looks just like you' or `Oh, she has your nose'. Her eye colour is the same blue as mine and she's fine featured, like me," Nicola says.

They compare Cadence's weight to her genetic brother's baby milestones, who was born a week overdue.

"She would probably have been the same weight if she'd been in as long," Chris says.

While their journey is in its infancy, both couples have only good things to say about embryo donation.

"It's all positive," Darryn says.

It is impossible, says Peter, to describe their joy at seeing a baby born after determinedly keeping the embryos frozen for so long.

"When you look at Cadence, you couldn't imagine disposing of her," he says.

Keeping embryos frozen for so long is controversial and banned in most countries unless people get exemptions.

Several international cryopreservation experts told the Sunday Star-Times the only known longer case of a frozen IVF human embryo becoming a baby was in the United Kingdom in 2005, where a mother had a baby 16 years after her first IVF child.

"It is astonishing and I think the community will be interested in it," says Dr Alan Trounson, a former Australian embryologist who helped create the world's first frozen IVF baby in Melbourne in 1984.

Long-term freezing was debated in the early days of freezing IVF embryos, he says.

"I was always comfortable with it. I thought it was up to the patients to decide," says American-based Trounson, who heads the California Institute of Regenerative Medicine, one of America's top stem cell research institutes. He says there is no reason why human embryos can't remain frozen for decades.

"Some people might feel outraged about it," Trounson says.

Darryn and Nicola admit there have been a few negative jibes about the embryo's age.

"One person said `she's missed out on all her generation'. What a cruel thing to say," Darryn says.

Whether Cadence and her genetic brother are fraternal twins isn't clear because definitions vary from requiring the babies to be born from the same pregnancy to simply being conceived at the same time.

"We've tried to answer that question ourselves," Peter says. While they don't know the answer, they believe life begins when the fertilised egg starts dividing.

Darryn and Nicola are keen to have three or four children and plan to try again with another of their remaining frozen donated embryos early next year, unless they fall pregnant naturally. If successful, their next offspring will break world records as the longest time a human embryo has been frozen then successfully thawed.

Both families desperately want to encourage others with surplus frozen IVF embryos to consider donating to other infertile couples.

"If there is another couple out there who can donate or one couple who can receive because of this story, that's worth it," Peter says.

"There are a lot of people out there who can make this happen," says Chris.

"They [the frozen embryos] sit in limbo all this time, but to see something happen to them beats seeing them destroyed. They are life she's an example of this," she says of Cadence.

Nicola says the embryos have been "an unbelievable gift". "We want potential donors to know that this can be such a wonderful thing for the recipients and the donors. No money, not anything can compare to this. Peter and Chris see the joy on our faces. They get to know that what they did years ago hasn't gone to waste. Embryos are created to potentially be a life, not to be stored. Just look at Cadence and you know that."

Friday, June 26, 2009

Michael Jackson ...

As a child I loved Michael Jackson (along with Prince) .. had posters all over my wall (esp at the "Thriller" album stage ) .. as a teenager I wasn't in love with him anymore .. but still played and really liked his music ..

.. now even as an adult I still listen to his albums and throughout all the "stuff" that went on in his life .. was still interested (and in some cases felt sad) to see how he lived his life

.. now sadly he has gone.

I remember the first time I saw him singing in Jackson 5 in a documentary talking about his life .. then later on in a video "Don't stop to you get enough"  .. the "Thriller" video spooked the sh*t out of me .. and "Billie Jean" and "Bad" were my fav videos after that .. then along cam "Man in the mirror" ..

I remember some of my workmates going to his concert when he came to NZ and raving about it .. and wishing I hadn't been so "cool" and had gone to see it !!!

..  but anyhoo to have so much of your life in the limelight must have been tough

.. and finally after all the publicity has gone .. he'll finally be able to have the privacy he craved ..

RIP Michael Jackson .. your songs still rock!

from the stuff site

image

CHILD STAR TO MEGASTAR

Jackson was born on Aug. 29, 1958, in Gary, Indiana, the seventh of nine children. Five Jackson boys - Jackie, Tito, Jermaine, Marlon and Michael - first performed together at a talent show when Michael was 6. They walked off with first prize and went on to become a best-selling band, The Jackson Five, and then The Jackson 5.

Jackson made his first solo album in 1972, and released  ''Thriller'' in 1982, which became a smash hit that yielded seven top-10 singles. The album sold 21 million copies in the United States and at least 27 million worldwide.

The next year, he unveiled his signature ''moonwalk'' dance move while performing ''Billie Jean'' during an NBC special.

In 1994, Jackson married Elvis Presley's only child, Lisa Marie, but the marriage ended in divorce in 1996. Jackson married Debbie Rowe the same year and had two children, before splitting in 1999. The couple never lived together.

Jackson has three children named Prince Michael I, Paris Michael and Prince Michael II, known for his brief public appearance when his father held him over the railing of a hotel balcony, causing widespread criticism.

TIMELINE:

A look at the career of Michael Jackson:
   - Aug. 29, 1958: Michael Joseph Jackson is born in Gary, Indiana, the seventh of nine children.
   - 1963: After several years of training, The Jackson 5 begin to perform in public.
   - Dec. 14, 1969: The Jackson 5 appear on the ''The Ed Sullivan Show.''
   - 1970: Their first album, ''Diana Ross Presents the Jackson 5,'' includes the hit singles ''I Want You Back'' and ''I'll Be There,'' which go to No. 1.
   - 1972: While still singing with the Jackson 5, Michael Jackson puts out his first solo album, ''Got to Be There.''
   - 1979: Jackson's first solo album as an adult, ''Off the Wall,'' is released. He becomes the first solo artist to place four singles from the same record in the top 10.
   - 1982: His album ''Thriller'' wins a record eight Grammys and becomes the world's biggest selling record of all time. Along with the title track, it includes the songs ''Billie Jean'' and ''Beat It.''
   - 1983: Jackson electrifies the 50 million viewers of the ''Motown 25'' television special by singing and dancing to ''Billie Jean'' while wearing a black fedora, one white glove, and pants that end above his ankles.
   - 1984: During production of a Pepsi-Cola commercial, Jackson's scalp sustains burns when an explosion sets his hair on fire.
   - 1985: Jackson and Lionel Richie write what becomes one of the fastest-selling singles ever with ''We Are the World.'' The song was produced to raise money for victims of the Ethiopian famine.
   - 1987: His album ''Bad'' produces five No. 1 singles and sells at least 22 million copies worldwide.
   - 1995: Releases the album ''HIStory: Past, Present, and Future Book I.'' In August, the song ''You Are Not Alone'' becomes the first single in pop music history to enter the Billboard chart at No. 1.
   - 1997: The album, ''Blood on the Dance Floor: HIStory in the Mix,'' sells in the hundreds of thousands worldwide, disappointing numbers for Jackson.

- Reuters, AP, and Stuff.co.nz

Billie Jean video -

Thriller video -

Beat it video -

Man in the mirror -

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Too funny ...

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/blogs/moatas-blog-idle/2483276/WOT-NXT-TVNZ

WOT NXT TVNZ?

Last updated 08:37 09/06/2009

Dear someone important at TVNZ,

I am writing with regards to those helpful little graphics you display on your channel telling us a) what we're watching now, b) what we could be watching soon or c) what we could watch tomorrow.  I really look forward to these as I do not know how to operate a TV guide, or the internet, two easily available ways I might otherwise come across this very important programming information.  I really like that you're thinking of me and my informational needs.  It makes me feel special.

I have noticed recently that the person at your organisation in charge of spelling things has not been paying attention. (Is he a boy? I find that they are often easily distracted by women with large breasts. Could this be the problem?) In any case your otherwise very jaunty and helpful graphics have been misspelt a lot recently.  No, really they have.  I didn't expect it of our national broadcaster either but I wrote some of them down.  Recently I have seen the following -

TON

NXT

LTR

TMW

I was really quite confused by these to start with.  What did they mean?  TON could be a unit for measuring weight in the United States, but NXT? LTR? TMW?  Fewer vowels than a Welsh street sign, no?  And then I remembered that sometimes the young folk with their phones and the texting often leave the vowels out of words, because of the restricted number of characters allowed per message and because it is faster.  And just like the boffins at Bletchley Park who cracked that pesky Enigma code, by golly I'd nailed it.  TON=Tonight, NXT=Next, LTR=Later and TMW=Tomorrow.  Next stop the Rosetta Stone.  I'm on a roll.

But I was still confused.  Surely the main reason for using these abbreviated versions of words is down to a lack of space or to cut down on time keying in on a phone keypad?  You don't use mobile phones to make your graphics, do you?  Surely you've got flasher equipment than that.  Computers and things.  Surely your whole budget isn't spent on Simon Barnett's hair products?

And then I realised what it's about.  You're trying to be cool, aren't you?  You're trying to be hip and "down with the kids".  Oh, oh, dear.  No.  Please don't.  You're not cool enough for that.  You are TVNZ.  You are nearly thirty.  That's just not feasible.  Let me lay it out for you.  You are our state broadcaster, therefore you will never really be cool.  Please just leave that to C4.  It's where music (and skinny jeans) lives.  C4 is hip and cool.  Similarly TV3 will always be cooler than you because it's younger (still a teenager in fact).  Prime is the "underdog" aka "the little channel that could" and Māori TV is simultaneously artsy and worthy.  You, TVNZ, just get to be dependable and...there.  You using text language in your ads would be like me walking around in a trucker cap and baggy jeans.  It's a wee bit sad, not to mention try-hard.

Anyway, I just thought that you should know this since apparently no one who works there is willing to say anything (like when you're wearing a really unflattering outfit but your friends all say that you look great).  Please go back to using vowels.  They are there for a reason.

Yours sincerely,

MT TMR (see how confusing that is?)

and whatta ya know ..

TVNZ scraps text ads after backlash

By CLIO FRANCIS - Fairfax Media

Last updated 15:35 09/06/2009

photo

TOO SHORT: One of the ads which TVNZ has been forced to remove after a public backlash.

Television New Zealand has been forced to scrap a new advertising campaign featuring promos with text language after a backlash from members of the public.

TVNZ spokeswoman Megan Richards said the new promos, which screen exclusively on TV2, were introduced around a fortnight ago and there had been a "clear message" from the public that they were not popular.

"We have learned in that period that vowels are extremely important to New Zealanders."

The ads featured abbreviations for upcoming shows, using 'TON' for 'tonight' and 'TMW' for tomorrow in the style of language usually used in cellphone text messges.

TVNZ were aware of the Facebook site created to fight the vowel-free promos and had received "dozens of letters and emails" on the matter, Ms Richards said.

More than 6000 people have signed up to the 'I hate TV2's new abbreviations' Facebook group.

"While TV channels don't stand still and we'll try new ideas and look for points of differences, there is no point in having a point of difference that people don't like," she said.

"It was an idea that was obviously not appreciated."

Ms Richards said the promo campaign had been created "in-house" and had involved "no extraordinary cost".

The new-look promos would be phased out in the coming days, she said.

"Progressively, over the next few days and weeks it will return to the way it was and you will see vowels once again." 

A blog by Moata Tamaira on Stuff.co.nz about the ads received more than 100 comments, most of them negative.

"It took me ages to figure out what 'TON' and 'TMW' meant," said one poster.

"I think it's ridiculous. 'TON' annoys me the most - it's like they forgot the rest of the word. Bring back the old format," said another.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

An article that caught my eye ..

from essentialbaby.com.au

The guilt-inducing indulgence of me time

  • Kylie Orr
  • May 27, 2009

Essential Baby blogger Kylie Orr

Essential Baby blogger Kylie Orr

"Me time" is a fairly recent phenomenon, I am led to believe. My mother's generation was reared with significantly fewer options than we have today. The simple life plan was to work, get married, have children (with whom they stayed at home until those children grew up) and then perhaps return to the workforce. The expectation was that the role of mother and wife was part of life rather than a choice made.

This is not to say they felt ecstatic about their roles 100% of the time but maybe they were just more accepting? "Me time" probably would have been well and truly embraced by them, had they seen it as an option but with restricted discussion about the daily frustrations of raising a family, and certainly no internet sites to vent on, there were limited outlets for the topic to be raised.

Popping out for a coffee with a friend (and no children) seems like a fairly common outing these days. My mum assures me she had no idea what a "cappuccino" was when we were young so going out for a coffee with a friend wasn't something she ever did, pre- or post-children. Now swigging out of the vodka bottle in the linen cupboard, that was a whole other thing...

I hear the catch phrase "Me time" quite often. I was recently asked what I would do with an entire day a week if I had no children to look after and no job obligations. I couldn't answer.

Actually I could answer- I could answer it with two options - but neither sat well with me, or the person who asked. I could:

1.  Stay at home and tackle Mt Washing that's slowly threatening to close off the airvents to the rest of the house; I could scrub kitchen cupboards and clean out and refold all the contents of the linen press; I could call the bank to sort out a 3 month old issue, the insurance company to compare quotes and the energy supplier to find out about green energy options once and for all, without constant interruptions from the treasures who like to hang off my legs as soon as I pick up the phone.

Maybe I'd finish a cup of tea, while it was still hot, and flick through a magazine. I may even take my time in the toilet instead of doing up my buttons on the run to attend to a screaming child. 

Or if I was going to be completely self-indulgent:

2.  I would sleep in (remember that?), have a cooked breakfast in my PJ's while reading the paper. I would have a 20 minute shower and burst all water restriction guidelines without a moment of guilt. I would style my hair. I would have lunch with a friend and gasbag over a couple of glasses of mid afternoon wine.

Next would be a facial and a massage followed by an afternoon kip. I may do a bit of window shopping and possibly purchase an unneeded bag, or pair of shoes. On credit.

So, these are extreme examples. One is based upon obligation, one is a dream of pure self indulgence. I wouldn't be keen to do either, to be honest.

I would feel great satisfaction and a sense of achievement from option one, as mundane and menial as the tasks are. I would feel refreshed and rejuvenated and entirely indulged and completely and utterly racked with guilt by the second. 

Why? I'm not really sure. I guess my husband doesn't have a day a week all to himself so why should I? He does escape the house and make phone calls without interruption, listen to whatever radio station he likes in the car and not answer 45 questions in a 5km radius.

Does this count as his "Me time"?  I can't even say that his day ends when he leaves the office as he runs his own business which comes with plenty of stresses of its own.

I have two hours a week to myself. I have to go to a personal trainer to get it, so I wouldn't say it is an ideal time of indulgence. If you knew me well, you'd know how desperate I must be for some time to myself to go and thrash about in a gym.

My husband is very laid back and a great supporter of any time I take to myself. It is me who is the time police. I have so little child-free time that when I do have it, I don't know how to use it effectively. Or without guilt.

"Me time" is a completely reasonable concept. I had it when I worked full time. I didn't have to answer to anyone if I wanted to do a spate of shopping or catch up for a leisurely weekend lunch with friends.

Now I have children, there are others relying on me, 24 hours a day. One voice in my head says get over yourself and accept this is all part of family life. The other voice screams "LADY! TAKE A BREAK!" The other voices all fight in the background and ask the same question over and over and then get sent to time out for interrupting.

I'm not sure it's necessarily "Me time" I need, it is personal space. I never quite anticipated how much this would be invaded once I had children. To be loved and adored and touched and hugged and kissed is a beautiful thing but I could never have expected that you could overdose on it.

Having your head climbed on by a three-year-old while you breastfeed a baby; or the leg of your pants tugged upon while you are trying to have a conversation with another adult; getting barged in on whilst on the toilet so you could answer the all-important question "how are clouds made" - they are all lovely in their own way but a constant invasion of personal space.

Head space is the other thing I could do with a little more of. I'm not being greedy, I'd just like to have some time where I didn't have to remember that Thursday is show and tell day, under the bed is where Child #2 left his shoe, I must  get the baby's 6 month immunisation done, and we need milk.

I'd like to have a moment in time where I was not required to undergo the Spanish Inquisition about what my favourite game was as a child, and did they have Ben10 when I was a girl and why is the moon in the sky when it's daytime and how come the baby gets to spit food on the floor but I can't? And when can I go to Dylan P's house for a play?

Everyone needs time to themselves. To reflect, refresh and remember who they are. What is reasonable "Me time" and how it is spent is for individual assessment.  Some people don't require much time alone, others crave more. All I know is that to give to everyone else 100% of the time, eventually depletes you.

I am not disciplined enough at assigning time to myself, I'm always saying "I'll take the baby" or "I'll be back by feral hour".  Who does this benefit in the end? Is this complete giving of myself going to end in a frazzled state of burn out all too soon? Will the mental meltdowns now be my territory rather than my three-year-olds?

Maybe it's time to sit down  on the toilet with a book and some earplugs and get a deadlock for the door. Would it be wrong to take in a glass of wine? "Me time", here I come!

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Girl with an apple


(This is a true story and you can find out more by Googling Herman Rosenblat. He was Bar Mitzvahed at age 75)


August 1942. Piotrkow, Poland.
The sky was gloomy that morning as we waited anxiously. All the men, women and children of Piotrkow's Jewish ghetto had been herded into a square.
Word had gotten around that we were being moved. My father had only recently died from typhus, which had run rampant through the crowded ghetto. My greatest fear was that our family would be separated.
"Whatever you do," Isidore, my eldest brother, whispered to me, "don't tell them your age. Say you're sixteen.
"I was tall for a boy of 11, so I could pull it off. That way I might be deemed valuable as a worker.
An SS man approached me, boots clicking against the cobblestones. He looked me up and down, and then asked my age.
"Sixteen," I said. He directed me to the left, where my three brothers and other healthy young men already stood.
My mother was motioned to the right with the other women, children, sick and elderly people.
I whispered to Isidore, "Why?"
He didn't answer.
I ran to Mama's side and said I wanted to stay with her.
"No, "she said sternly.
"Get away. Don't be a nuisance. Go with your brothers."
She had never spoken so harshly before. But I understood: She was protecting me She loved me so much that, just this once, she pretended not to. It was the last I ever saw of her.
My brothers and I were transported in a cattle car to Germany.
We arrived at the Buchenwald concentration camp one night weeks later and were led into a crowded barrack. The next day, we were issued uniforms and identification numbers.
"Don't call me Herman anymore." I said to my brothers. "Call me 94983."
I was put to work in the camp's crematorium, loading the dead into a hand-cranked elevator.
I, too, felt dead. Hardened, I had become a number.
Soon, my brothers and I were sent to Schlieben, one of Buchenwald's sub-camps near Berlin.
One morning I thought I heard my mother's voice..
"Son," she said softly but clearly, I am going to send you an angel."
Then I woke up. Just a dream. A beautiful dream.
But in this place there could be no angels. There was only work. And hunger. And fear.
A couple of days later, I was walking around the camp, around the barracks, near the barbed-wire fence where the guards could not easily see. I was alone.
On the other side of the fence, I spotted someone: a little girl with light, almost luminous curls. She was half-hidden behind a birch tree.
I glanced around to make sure no one saw me. I called to her softly in German "Do you have something to eat?"
She didn't understand.
I inched closer to the fence and repeated the question in Polish. She stepped forward. I was thin and gaunt, with rags wrapped around my feet, but the girl looked unafraid. In her eyes, I saw life.
She pulled an apple from her woolen jacket and threw it over the fence.
I grabbed the fruit and, as I started to run away, I heard her say faintly, "I'll see you tomorrow."
I returned to the same spot by the fence at the same time every day. She was always there with something for me to eat - a hunk of bread or, better yet, an apple.
We didn't dare speak or linger.. To be caught would mean death for us both.
I didn't know anything about her, just a kind farm girl, except that she understood Polish. What was her name? Why was she risking her life for me?
Hope was in such short supply, and this girl on the other side of the fence gave me some, as nourishing in its way as the bread and apples.
Nearly seven months later, my brothers and I were crammed into a coal car and shipped to Theresienstadt camp in Czechoslovakia.
"Don't return," I told the girl that day. "We're leaving.."
I turned toward the barracks and didn't look back, didn't even say good-bye to the little girl whose name I'd never learned, the girl with the apples.
We were in Theresienstadt for three months. The war was winding down and Allied forces were closing in, yet my fate seemed sealed.
On May 10, 1945, I was scheduled to die in the gas chamber at 10:00 AM.
In the quiet of dawn, I tried to prepare myself. So many times death seemed ready to claim me, but somehow I'd survived. Now, it was over.
I thought of my parents. At least, I thought, we will be reunited.
But at 8 A.M. there was a commotion. I heard shouts, and saw people running every which way through camp. I caught up with my brothers.
Russian troops had liberated the camp! The gates swung open. Everyone was running, so I did too. Amazingly, all of my brothers had survived;
I'm not sure how. But I knew that the girl with the apples had been the key to my survival.
In a place where evil seemed triumphant, one person's goodness had saved my life, had given me hope in a place where there was none.
My mother had promised to send me an angel, and the angel had come.
Eventually I made my way to England where I was sponsored by a Jewish charity, put up in a hostel with other boys who had survived the Holocaust and trained in electronics. Then I came to America, where my brother Sam had already moved I served in the U. S. Army during the Korean War, and returned to New York City after two years.
By August 1957 I'd opened my own electronics repair shop.. I was starting to settle in.
One day, my friend Sid who I knew from England called me.
"I've got a date. She's got a Polish friend. Let's double date."
A blind date? Nah, that wasn't for me.
But Sid kept pestering me, and a few days later we headed up to the Bronx to pick up his date and her friend Roma.
I had to admit, for a blind date this wasn't so bad. Roma was a nurse at a Bronx hospital. She was kind and smart. Beautiful, too, with swirling brown curls and green, almond-shaped eyes that sparkled with life.
The four of us drove out to Coney Island. Roma was easy to talk to, easy to be with.
Turned out she was wary of blind dates too!
We were both just doing our friends a favor. We took a stroll on the boardwalk, enjoying the salty Atlantic breeze, and then had dinner by the shore. I couldn't remember having a better time.
We piled back into Sid's car, Roma and I sharing the backseat.
As European Jews who had survived the war, we were aware that much had been left unsaid between us. She broached the subject, "Where were you," she asked softly, "during the war?"
"The camps," I said. The terrible memories still vivid, the irreparable loss. I had tried to forget. But you can never forget.
She nodded. "My family was hiding on a farm in Germany, not far from Berlin," she told me. "My father knew a priest, and he got us Aryan papers."
I imagined how she must have suffered too, fear, a constant companion. And yet here we were both survivors, in a new world.
"There was a camp next to the farm." Roma continued. "I saw a boy there and I would throw him apples every day."
What an amazing coincidence that she had helped some other boy. "What did he look like? I asked.
"He was tall, skinny, and hungry. I must have seen him every day for six months."
My heart was racing. I couldn't believe it.
This couldn't be.
"Did he tell you one day not to come back because he was leaving Schlieben?"
Roma looked at me in amazement. "Yes!"
"That was me!"
I was ready to burst with joy and awe, flooded with emotions. I couldn't believe it! My angel.
"I'm not letting you go." I said to Roma. And in the back of the car on that blind date, I proposed to her. I didn't want to wait.
"You're crazy!" she said. But she invited me to meet her parents for Shabbat dinner the following week.
There was so much I looked forward to learning about Roma, but the most important things I always knew: her steadfastness, her goodness. For many months, in the worst of circumstances, she had come to the fence and given me hope. Now that I'd found her again, I could never let her go.
That day, she said yes. And I kept my word. After nearly 50 years of marriage, two children and three grandchildren, I have never let her go.


Herman Rosenblat of Miami Beach, Florida

Wednesday, November 26, 2008

Braveheart battler Nathan Garcia thrown a lifeline

Article from: Herald Sun

Fingers crossed for Monique and Nathan ... argghhh!!!!!

By Grant McArthur

November 26, 2008 12:01am

BRAVEHEART battler Nathan Garcia has been thrown a lifeline.

The French inventor of a spinal support rod that could enable Nathan to have a life-saving heart operation has offered to immediately fly him to Paris for the implant.

On Monday the Herald Sun revealed Royal Children's Hospital safety procedures had delayed surgery to implant the rod in Melbourne.

Nathan's mum, Monique Garcia, was now speaking to respiratory doctors in Melbourne to find out if Nathan, 6, could survive the journey.

The founder of Phenix Medical, Arnaud Soubeiran, met the Royal Children's director of cardiac surgery, Dr Christian Brizard, in Paris on Monday to again discuss Nathan's condition.

He has told Ms Garcia he would arrange surgery at Paris's St Vincent de Paul Hospital, where more than 40 rods have been implanted in other patients, if Nathan is well enough to travel.

"I will provide you with all the support I can," he wrote to Ms Garcia.

"This of course includes offering a dedicated Phenix M device to Nathan and offering you to stay in my flat in Paris if this option works.

"But there is no doubt that time is playing against us and that we must make quickly the right decision because we won't have a second chance."

The Pascoe Vale boy was born with only half a heart and scoliosis, a condition that has deformed his spine and made him too ill to survive the complex open-heart surgery needed to prevent his fragile heart stopping.

Ms Garcia has criticised the RCH's new technologies committee for not allowing the rod to be implanted in Nathan's back because it is not approved in Australia.

While the chances of the rod improving Nathan's condition enough for him to undergo the heart surgery were unknown, Ms Garcia said he would die without it so she was hoping to accept the French offer.

"They have opened up a position for Nathan, and have offered to house me and take care of us," she said.

"I feel this is something that could really happen for Nathan, and could get him into the treatment that he needs much quicker, so it is a chance we have to take.

"It is a risk to fly, but we cannot afford to wait and I have to do everything to protect my son."

But RCH chief of surgery Leo Donnan said Nathan was in a stable condition with no immediate danger. The hospital was acting in his best interests by fully evaluating the new device.

"The technology committee has looked at the rod . . . and there are still a few questions that need to be completed before we can say it is safe," he said.

"We have a child that has a very precarious condition that could potentially be life-threatening by intervening with surgery.

"We are going to make sure everything we do is 100 per cent safe to maximise the chance of this child having a good outcome. It is not about bureaucracy . . . it is purely about giving this child the best chance of surviving."

Royal Children's Hospital red tape denies dying boy Nathan Garcia a chance

By Grant McArthur  

This is a friends son in Australia .. who has the same heart condition as Cameron ...

- Herald Sun

November 24, 2008 02:52am

Nathan Garcia

Killer bureaucracy ... Nathan Garcia, pictured with friend Miranda Lindsay, has been denied access to a new medical development that could save his life.

  • Dying boy, 6, has half a heart
  • Needs back surgery so heart can improve
  • Hospital says it must evaluate procedure first

A SIX-year-old boy with only half a heart is dying as red tape prevents Melbourne's Royal Children's Hospital surgeons giving him an operation and a chance to save his life.
As well as hypoplastic left heart syndrome, Nathan Garcia suffers from scoliosis - a condition that has deformed his spine and now places so much pressure on his arteries and lungs he is unable to undergo life-saving surgery to re-rout his half a heart before it stops beating.

Royal Children's orthopaedic surgeons had planned to place a new type of metal rod in Nathan's back to ease his scoliosis, improve his heart and lung function, and hopefully make him healthy enough to undergo the heart surgery.

However, the hospital's New Technologies Committee has refused permission for the operation. It says processes have not yet allowed it to evaluate and approve the French-designed Phenix Rod for safe use, and instead Nathan has been placed in palliative care.

Nathan's distraught mother, Monique Garcia, said her son would be dead or too crippled for the operation before the red tape cleared, and was appealing for the decision to be reversed for a one-off operation.

"They say it might be OK to use in a few months, but I'm terrified he'll be dead in two months," Ms Garcia said.

"Normally I would accept the process of approval, and it is warranted, but it doesn't have a place in this situation - he is going to die anyway.

"We have a surgeon who is wanting and trying to save his patient's life, but on the other side we have red tape, and I don't think anything should get in between a doctor and the welfare of their patient. He will die if he does not have this operation - and soon."

Nathan has been supported in hospital by best friend Miranda Lindsay, who regularly visits him.

Royal Children's orthopaedic surgeon Dr Ian Torode and director of cardiac surgery Dr Christian Brizard met the Phenix Rod's inventor, Arnaud Soubeiran, in Paris last month to discuss Nathan's case.

Royal Children's spokeswoman Julie Webber said the committee was examining the use of the Phenix Rod and a decision about its suitability as a treatment for Nathan would be made in his best interests.

"The decision will be made around what is in the best interests of the child," she said.

Your Say

If the operation goes ahead and the child dies will the parets sue? The medical board are scared of this happening. Sad reality of life.

Posted by: Glenn of Melbourne 4:11pm today
Comment 29 of 29

"In the Best Interest of the Child" well I think that should be left up to the parents to make that dissection, not a board room who would be looking at another case number. I am an Australian and have been living outside of Australia for the past 11 years in China. Very sad to say but this is another perfect example of what I always ask, who is living in a communist country? Monique please stay srong never give up and people of Melbourne Victoria, get behind this young boys dream of living.

Posted by: Glenn Baldock 4:05pm today
Comment 28 of 29

Are there any other surgeons out there who'd like to have a go, slicing and dicing this terminally ill boy? Now is the perfect oppertunity to try any crazy new procedures you've got. Lets face it - the parents are desparate and will accept anything that you recommend, and the public don't mind if you use sick children for scientific experiments. Hell - they demand it! You'll get paid whether your idea works or not. What could go wrong?!? (Well, maybe the kid will die - but who cares - he was going to die anyway. If you fluke it, and help the kid, you will be more famous and richer! There is no risk! Surely this dying kid wouldn't mind using his last few breaths to inflate your wallet.) RIGHT EVERYONE?

Posted by: frightened of medical experiments 4:02pm today
Comment 27 of 29

If it was the parent refusing to have this operation, they would be criminally charged. If this poor little boy dies because he is denied this treatment, they should charge the people who denied this surgery to him. It seems like it is way to easy for them to hide behind their clipboards and take no responsibility for the devastation they are causing this poor family! Good Luck Nathan, hope you win mate!

Posted by: Michelle of null 3:46pm today
Comment 26 of 29

I agree with Samantha, comment 10. The point of this process is to promote patient safety not to differ operations. That is the point of government, accountability, leadership and process. If everyone came to the hospital with a print out from the net of some half baked procedure, you would have increased deaths, blown out waiting lists as well as more people suing the doctors because "they are in a position of trust to inform the patient of the right direction for their situation". It is sad that he may die and without any help he certainly would anyway, but hopefully he will survive and get a quality procedure done and then live a happy life. Stories like this, while depressing, may bring some attention to the fact that hospitals are also understaffed and underbudgeted and this could bring some positive results. But I wouldn't hold my breath on it.

Posted by: Paully of Brissy 3:43pm today
Comment 25 of 29

This beautiful child should be given the option of living. Red tape does not belong in this situation.

Posted by: Dion of Perth, WA 3:26pm today
Comment 24 of 29

Guy of Adelaide (comment 8), you are right to a certain extent about the people who get to put processes in place. My husband is a Senior Principal Civil Engineer working for Main Roads. He is faced every day with frustrating processes that hinder him from doing his job. Processes put into place by, as you say, clerical staff and high placed admin staff that do not have the required degree in Civil Engineering to come up with such processes. The Public Sector has highly qualified staff with years of experience whose every move is also met with red tape so please dont tar the whole system with the 'get rid of them' brush. They have to come up with these process to keep lay people of the general public happy when they want answers regarding road safety etc from the equally lay Politicians who have to say what the voters like to hear (not to mention in Brisbane the Public Sector bashing Courier Mail) All one big Political, Public Liability fearing farce really.

Posted by: corinne of Brisbane 3:12pm today
Comment 23 of 29

I simply cannot believe this! There is an option available that may give young Nathan a chance at life ... and he should be given it. How dare they condemn him to death.

Posted by: another heart mum of Newcastle 2:51pm today
Comment 22 of 29

the human life has no value anymore. god help us all

Posted by: marlene bortoli of central coast 2:46pm today
Comment 21 of 29

Just put the damn rod in already! ... jebus...

Posted by: David W of Brisbane 2:33pm today
Comment 20 of 29

There is some amzaing medical technology out there, not all of it is beneficial to every, or even any patient. Just because the French has approved it does not mean it will guarantee the boy a positive outcome. The medical board will respond in time I'm sure.

Posted by: Mr M of bne 1:15pm today
Comment 19 of 29

If the headline read, "Surgeons testing experimental surgery on terminally ill children" then how would you all feel? The New Technologies Committee is here to ensure the humane treatment of people so we don't treat them like lab rats, regardless of the parent's desires. Neither party can say for sure he'll be dead in two months and the doctors seem to be more informed in this case, "Royal Children's orthopaedic surgeon Dr Ian Torode and director of cardiac surgery Dr Christian Brizard met the Phenix Rod's inventor, Arnaud Soubeiran, in Paris last month to discuss Nathan's case."

Posted by: Nick 1:12pm today
Comment 18 of 29

God bless this little boy and his family and friends. If Nathan's doctors and surgeon are supporting this procedure and the family want it, then the hospital needs to back down and butt out. At times such as this decisions need to be made quickly. It is NOT in the best interests of the child to delay. Red tape has its place, but the time to act is NOW. May sanity prevail. Best wishes Nathan ... you are a little trooper. I am praying for you.

Posted by: Elizabeth of Queensland 1:10pm today
Comment 17 of 29

This is the unfortunate impact of the amount of medical litigation in our society. No-one will take a chance, the hospital must go through an exhaustive review and evaluation process because if things go wrong they would be looking at a multi million dollar law suit. This is the health system the public has demanded through their own actions. It's a shame some of the innocent victims will be children.

Posted by: Shane 12:54pm today
Comment 16 of 29

This is the sort of typical luddite, blinkered thinking that Keeps Australia in the technological dark ages. ""The decision will be made around what is in the best interests of the child," she said" Julie Webber, if this was your child you'd just about move heaven and earth to get anything done to help it. Best interests of the child my eye... Moreso the least letigious course of action of the hospital to avoid any damages claim. If the child is doomed without this procedure, then with the procedure, is hardly likely to make anything worse,.. god australia you make me sick. Land of the introverted and home of the technophobe.

Posted by: Steve K of Perth/Hong Kong 12:38pm today
Comment 15 of 29

This boy has nothing to lose, and so much to gain if this procedure is successful. The hospital should stop worrying about the 'wotif' it doesn't work, and start thinking abouth the 'wotif' it does work.

Posted by: V of Darwin 12:34pm today
Comment 14 of 29

Totally agree Samantha (comment 10). Even if the parents agree to sign away all their rights to litigation if anything should go wrong there are still countless ways to get around this and sue the hospital anyway. The hospital system has some serious shortcomings but in this sort of scenario they're stuffed either way.

Posted by: Damien 12:32pm today
Comment 13 of 29

If it was a family member of the committee, I am convinced that it would be rushed through. If there is a small chance this little boy may survive this surgery to endure a life-saving operation, shouldn't it be allowed? Shouldn't he at least be given a chance. The alternative is obviously much worse and cruel all-round. If its that risky and the hospital are concerned about litigation, couldn't the parents sign some kind of waiver, just so that their son has a chance at life?? So much for our educated idiots running the world; most have lost sight of the simple things!

Posted by: MumB 12:14pm today
Comment 12 of 29

I bet if it was their child it would be a different story, any mother/father would give life to save the life of their child, my heart goes out to the family and I give my strength to the little boy, keep fighting buddy.

Posted by: Karen of Adelaide 11:57am today
Comment 11 of 29

If the operation is proven overseas and the doctors in charge of the patient are convinced it is in the best interests of the patient, then cut the red tape and let this happen. However, don't let it become a precedent for any future desperate attemtps to prolong life without going through proper assessment procedures.

Posted by: Allan of Gold Coats 11:56am today
Comment 10 of 29

Doctors/hospitals are damned if they do and damned if they don't. On the one hand it may be unsafe to proceed with an operation that is not yet deemed safe and that they have no experience with and on the other the parents are saying that her child cannot wait 2 months while this procedure is evaluated. In this age of litigation - if this hospital went ahead with this unevaluated procedure and the child died the parents and their lawyers would be suing for millions for wrongful death. I am sure the hospital is doing what they can to keep this child alive and in as little pain as possible. He is lucky compared to millions of children in other countries who would not even have the chance of this type of care let alone the prospect of being 'saved'. Hospitals & doctors just cannot win or keep everyone happy... I am sure that they are doing this in the best interests of this child and at the moment and that his life is less at risk right now than if they proceed without more investigation of the risk. The way that the media portrays every article in the most negative and controversial light is getting very tedious.

Posted by: Samantha 11:56am today
Comment 9 of 29

What Julie Webber really means is "who is going to pay for this"?????? How about the media focus on her and the committee!!! and not just the committee...get the names of everyone on it and print them so we all know who is really responsible for what happens to Nathan. good luck mate!

Posted by: Robert of Brisbane 11:13am today
Comment 8 of 29

The saddest thing is the people who created the process are clerical staff who got promoted by means of brown nosing and backstabbing, have no real skill or clinical experiences but are just plain bureaucrats. We need to get rid of the state governments, they are useless and are a waste of money.

Posted by: guy of Adelaide 11:11am today
Comment 7 of 29

What a load of bollocks. Its in the child's best interest to ensure a life lived as long as possible which this rod will extend! Placing him in palliative care is a definete death sentence and is in no shape or form "in the child's best interest". As stated, the committee is just wants the child to die a painful death in palliative care, outside of their responsibilities, than risk anything negative happening with the rod. If they choose not to go through with it, I am going to forgo my annual $10k donation to the hospital. I donate my money to save children, not to let them die because of red tape. That is a principle I cannot forgive

Posted by: Paul 11:06am today
Comment 6 of 29

Surely if the parents are aware of the potential complications and agree for the procedure (however groundbreaking in Australia it is) to go ahead, the red tape should be cut. However I suppose this is what comes from having to pander to so many money grabbing, public liability squawking ignoramuses. All the payouts that have occured add another metre to the red tape. Great hey?

Posted by: Corinne of Brisbane 11:06am today
Comment 5 of 29

We need to petition to get action.

Posted by: Nicole of melbourne 10:32am today
Comment 4 of 29

Seems like an easy one to me. When is it ever in a patients best interests to die? The only flaw I could see is if the rod caused untold amounts of pain but thats only speculation. If the rod wont cause some other kind of debilitation in its own right I say go for it!

Posted by: da of Sydney 9:19am today
Comment 3 of 29

This is appalling. A childs life hangs in the balance. Stuff this red tape and get on with it. I pray he makes it and is allowed to have the operation. If it was one of their kids would the situation be different ????

Posted by: Nat 9:14am today
Comment 2 of 29

What a buggered up system

Posted by: Nathan of Hobart 9:11am today
Comment 1 of 29

Friday, November 21, 2008

Kyah's journey an inspiration for thousands

By GREER MACDONALD - The Dominion Post | Friday, 21 November 2008

image 

DEAN KOZANIC/The Press

FOREVER REMEMBERED: Fundraising websites have gathered nearly $20,000 for the Child Cancer Foundation, in dedication to Kyah Milne. Her battle with cancer ended on Wednesday morning.

Kyah Milne may have drawn her last breath in her fight against cancer, but her battle has inspired thousands to dig deep to provide continuing support for others.

Fundraising websites have attracted nearly $20,000 of donations toward the Child Cancer Foundation in dedication to Kyah's battle, which ended in her parents' Johnsonville home on Wednesday morning.

She died peacefully, with her parents and her much-loved stuffed toy "Giraffe" at her side, just over a week before her third birthday. .

Kyah was found to have neuroblastoma, a rare cancer of the adrenal glands, when she was 19 months old.

Tributes have flowed from around the world to the online journal that was kept by her parents throughout the toddler's 505-day rule-breaking fight with the disease.

"She has gone to a place where she can run and play just like any other almost-three-year-old" can, where she is surrounded by butterflies and Polly Pockets and where she is no longer in pain," her mother, Shanell Christian, wrote on the site.

Kyah's father, Jason Milne, told The Dominion Post yesterday that the many donations were "absolutely amazing".

"I guess that's just one of the ways that people can help, and that's fantastic - that's what we've always said through this journey, for people not to send gifts, just donate to child cancer or Ronald McDonald House."

Donations can also be left at Kyah's funeral service, which begins at 1pm today at the Lychgate Chapel in Johnsonville.

Mr Milne said the support the family received from Christchurch and Wellington hospitals and from community nurses was "absolutely amazing", and that staff had become like family.

The popular journal of Kyah's treatment and fight against cancer, which was regularly updated by her parents, received more than 1000 comments of condolence after her death.

Mr Milne said he hoped the entries would eventually be made into a book so that the couple's two other children, 12-year-old Kaleb and seven-year-old Jordan, would understand "how to treat people, and how people can band together".

Thursday, November 20, 2008

Notices ..

scan0004a scan0004

In the newspaper today ..

By RYAN EVANS ryan.evans@tnl.co.nz - Taranaki Daily News | Thursday, 20 November 2008

Partner 'absolutely devastated' by crane operator's death

For Allan Peacock's loved ones it still feels like he isn't really gone.

It feels like he is away on one of his long-haul truck runs and he'll be coming home soon.

The 38-year-old crane operator was killed in a freak crane accident at McCurdy Engineering's New Plymouth yard on Monday, hit in the head by a flying D-link bolt after a strop broke while he was moving a load of heavy gas cylinders.

Yesterday, Mr Peacock's sister-in-law Jan Applegarth said his partner (her sister) Robyn Roper was still too distressed to talk about the accident.

"She's devastated, absolutely devastated," Mrs Applegarth said.

"She's trying to put a brave face on it but I know deep down she's hurting big time because she's lost her soul mate."

Mr Peacock had worked for Roebuck Cranes for about three months.

A truck lover, he had previously worked for seven years as a truck driver for Symons Transport, driving long-haul runs to the South Island.

He had left the job so he could spend more time at home, Mrs Applegarth said.

"He was away lots, missed Christmas and things and this Christmas was going to be his first at home for a while."

Mr Peacock was born in Wellington and grew up in South Taranaki.

He was known for wearing a beanie and sunglasses and a very safety-conscious attitude.

He was wearing a safety helmet when he was killed, Mrs Applegarth said.

He loved fishing, squash and camping with Miss Roper and his nephews, nieces and other family members at the back of his brother-in-law's farm, Mrs Applegarth said.

"They did it every year with the kids, just chilling out with them on my brother's farm," she said.

"He loved teasing the young ones, you know, have them on like you do, give them a bit of a tickle.

"He was well-knowledged in a lot of things and could do a lot of things, a very handy-man type person, he would have a go at anything.

"He was quite a quiet person, but he also knew how to have a joke with you as well."

Mrs Applegarth said her sister had been swamped with phone calls, flowers and messages of support from people and wanted to thank them all for their support.

She said her sister didn't want anybody to be blamed for the accident.

"It's just one of those things, it's life and you have to accept it, she knows and we all know.

"It's tragic. It's going to take a long time to get over for all of us really because he was like a brother not a brother-in-law."

Saturday, August 16, 2008

A follow-up article ...

My friend is the person mentioned in the article as ...

"She has only one child, a daughter aged 40 who lives in rural Taranaki. "

I haven't been able to get hold of her ..she has got her phone on answerphone (understandably) ... and I hope she is OK ...

By RICHARD WOODD richard.woodd@tnl.co.nz - Taranaki Daily News | Saturday, 16 August 2008

Joy's death wish finds sympathy, rekindles debate

Joy Hunter has been besieged with calls after declaring her right to kill herself in Thursday's Taranaki Daily News.

"I didn't really like the exposure and the headline but if I'm connecting with other like-minded people, then I'm pleased to have got the voluntary euthanasia debate rekindled," she says.

All the major radio talkback hosts have called her and on Monday she will be interviewed by TV3.

"I had a woman phone me from Wellington to offer a drug that can be used for suicide and she claims it's untraceable. I've told her I'm prepared to meet her," she says.

"I can do what I like to myself but the law will prosecute anyone who assists me. I'll do what I can to have the law decriminalised, while I'm still able," she says.

Mrs Hunter, 77, is a stalwart of the Eltham Historical Society and in 2005 published Slices From New Zealand History, a history of milling and bread-making.

"How long have I got? I don't know. I have cancer developing, and I have bowel function problems. It's a question of what gets me first: the cancer or another stroke or dementia," she says.

"Despite all that I'm still quite fit and my heart is strong. I'm driving legally again but I've lost my confidence since the stroke."

She has only one child, a daughter aged 40 who lives in rural Taranaki.

"I've told her what I plan to do and she was very upset but it's my choice. I'd never involve her.

"She wanted to build a granny flat or extra room for me, but it wouldn't be the same as Eltham, so I'm staying here in the Masonic flats."

When she does pass on, naturally or from her own actions, Mrs Hunter wants a simple cremation, and no big fuss, but says her daughter vows she will organise a wake in her honour.

"My ashes can be buried under an oak tree at her place that was grown from a seed of the Pitcaithly Oak in Thames.

"That grew from an acorn planted by in 1864 by my Scottish great-great-grandmother."

Mrs Hunter said she incorrectly named a veterinary euthanasia drug in Thursday's story as Benulate, when it should have been Nembutal.

Thursday, August 14, 2008

A newspaper article in the Daily News - 14th August 2008

OK .. so I did get to do a 4th post .. but this has kinda rocked my world ...

This lady is my friend's mum .. not something I expected to see on the inside of the paper ... when I talked to her on Tuesday, I said to DH that she seemed to have lost her "spark" for life ... it is a "shock" to hear she had tried to commit suiside in October, as when we talked she said the doctors "did not know" what caused her to suddenly become unconscious .. now we know how she did ...

Was she "ashamed" that she did then .. and now is not .. I'm not sure .. a lot of questions ...

By LYN HUMPHREYS lyn.humphreys@tnl.co.nz - Taranaki Daily News | Thursday, 14 August 2008

Joy determined to die

17107394

Photo: BRADLEY AMBROSE

Joy Hunter wants voluntary euthanasia to become law in New Zealand.

An Eltham woman says she is determined to die before she needs to go into a rest home or becomes a burden on her family.

Joy Hunter, 77, says she has had a full and interesting life, but now wants the right to kill herself humanely.

But after three failed attempts to take her own life she wants to live long enough to see voluntary euthanasia become legal in New Zealand.

In October, she took sleeping pills but was found unconscious in her chair by her caring neighbours and resuscitated - despite filling in a do-not-resuscitate form.

"I was very surprised to wake up. I was disappointed."

Two other attempts have also failed.

Ms Hunter was an NAC airhostess, married a pilot, lived overseas, became a mother, author, expert on herbs, and has diplomas in aromatherapy and therapeutic massage.

But she now has incurable cancer and has had a minor stroke.

"I want to go before I have another stroke. It's time for me."

The news that she had made the suicide attempts has shocked her good friend, retired nurse, Di Hutton, of New Plymouth.

But Ms Hutton, 74, says she supports her friend's move for voluntary euthanasia as do many of their friends.

"Joy is a real old trooper. She's had an amazing life. She's lovely, is Joy."

When she was nursing, she often saw morphine used for cancer sufferers when they were near death, Ms Hutton said. "You can't stand by and let people suffer," Ms Hutton said.

Their stance is made more difficult in Taranaki which she describes as parochial.

Ms Hunter says she has been an honorary member of the Voluntary Euthanasia Society of New Zealand for two years and attended workshops in Wellington and an Exit International conference in Christchurch in July.

She has found GPs not keen to talk about euthanasia. One replied that he had taken the hypocratic oath.

"It's very noble but times have changed," she said.

Ms Hunter said she is well aware that New Zealanders travelling overseas are bringing back Benulate, which vets use for euthanising animals, so they can use it for themselves.

However the cost, at $5000 on the black market, means it is often only affordable for the rich.

"Voluntary euthanasia is for people still cognitive. I can't see that anyone else should be involved. It could be open to abuse but if the law covers it properly it shouldn't be abused.

"I'll try and get this recommended and supported while I am able. I'd like to live to see the law decriminalised."

She finds the growth in privatised rest homes in Taranaki upsetting. She remains upset that her own mother was not well cared for in a rest home.